More information about this seller Contact this seller 6. More information about this seller Contact this seller 7. Text is Free of Markings. Shows some signs of wear, and may have some markings on the inside. Seller Inventory GRP More information about this seller Contact this seller 8. Seller Inventory A. More information about this seller Contact this seller 9. More information about this seller Contact this seller Never used!.
Seller Inventory P Ships with Tracking Number! May not contain Access Codes or Supplements. May be ex-library. Buy with confidence, excellent customer service!. Seller Inventory n. Condition: As New. No Jacket. Hbk pp no dj as issued decorated laminated boards an unread copy excellent as new. Oh, you might recoil from it put so bluntly, but if you accept that existence doesn't matter, then the gentle, kind, persuasive ending of all entities who suffer or might suffer lies at the logical end of that road. It is just a matter of how far along you are today in your considerations of euthanasia and pain.
This is the fall into nihilism, driven by the urge to flee from suffering, and the conviction that your own assemblies of meaning are weak and empty in the face of the grief that is past, and the grief that you know lies ahead. And insightful. You're postulating a much subtler and more gradual reason for the widespread fatalism about aging and death than the "terror management theory" aspects embedded in Dr.
I think this also makes it easy to understand the power of religion to get us through the dark night.
Nietzsche’s Nihilism in Walter Benjamin | SpringerLink
Corbin: Indeed. And when I was reading Reason's article, I felt happy of living in a time when we at last know why we suffer, why we die, why we can think, how we came here, etc.
Two centuries ago I would have no explanation at all. And a few decades ago I couldn't see any escape from death. But even if I understand the reasoning, I just can't accept many people just let this all happen without actively steering against it. I don't blame the people centuries or even decades ago because I realize they had no realistic chance although they could have been the ones to start research or make progress on aging much earlier for some of which of course this may apply.
Even nowadays most approaches regarding defeating aging are pathetic you know what I'm talking about. So what is wrong with people not you people, but the majority of society apparently? We must first dream of a better world and then make it real. We can achieve many great things if we free ourselves from the phsychological burden that drags us down deeper and deeper as we see more suffering.
- Subscribe to RSS.
- Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning?
- Navigation menu.
- Polymer Synthesis: Theory and Practice: Fundamentals, Methods, Experiments.
- Crochet Pink 26 Patterns to Crochet for Comfort, Gratitude, and Charity;
- Pathfinder Chronicles: Book of the Damned Volume 3 - Horsemen of the Apocalypse!
- What exactly is "clinical despair"? And how can we treat it?!
Though interestingly my response was, fuck that shit happening to me any time soon! Let's get this ball rolling!
We’re Doomed. Now What?
For some of us, its even earlier. At 7, I watched my father die from a wasting cancer for 5 years before he died. Really opens your eyes and poisons the whole 'Life experience'. You never even get to have those young carefree years without feeling the sword of Damocles ever present. I can relate all too well. Yep, life extension research is itself a statement of fundamental human value in the face of a hostile uncaring universe. Forget a billion years, it would be amazing to live to 10, years as an individual.
Right now Its up in the air whether we can survive for the next hundred years or not. That will be a great confidence booster to the general populace who will be more excited than ever and speed up the growth of the field. Then they think they're next and become weak mentally and physically. Only way to get this mindset is to foster a growth mindset with a positive attitude which takes a lot of willpower and will be hard to do so in face of our current reality but we must develop these traits.
Better off fighting than waiting.
We had to put our dog down two days ago. He broke his leg and was howling and suffering horribly; we were told he would never recover because of his advanced age, and would live life in terrible pain. I wish I had something that would have enabled him to heal. Aging is horrible and must be stopped. The resignation into nihilism and desire to live forever, are both part of the same limited perspective.
The truth is, even if you can extend your physical body to thousands of years, you will have changed so much physically and mentally, that you might as well have been born again. It is said most atoms in your physical body are replaced every 7 years, so you have in fact died and been reborn many times even in one life. Identity is really an illusion, but this can be a source of comfort, rather than a need to resign to nihilism. Parts of our identity and the most important parts already exist in other people, past and present and future.
While you physical body may and does die perpetually, through change or through decadence, your identity your thoughts and ideas will continue to live on so long as there is consciousness in this or other universes. Someday, and perhaps not a day to far off, we will be able to connect our nervous systems as they are now starting to do in animal experiments, and in that day, I fully expect, we will find we are already existing in other people, and death is as much as illusion as personal identity. People do change personalities over their lifetimes I've often wondered if people wouldn't act and feel like they were in their 20s forever, if they had they health and appearance of being in their 20s.
Just wanted to say thanks for this thought provoking post. Matter, as Newton explicitly recognized, is moveable but it is incapable of moving itself. This means that the concept of motion is not entailed by the concept of matter and cannot be derived from it. Accordingly, in this philosophy motion is a completely independent fundamental concept. Although not analytically derivable from matter, eventually, both Descartes and Newton allowed matter to have additional properties essential for scientific study of the material world.
Motion was still withheld from matter but matter was conceived as subject to being moved not self-motion or auto-motion. Consider first, the notion of an atom. Neither indivisible, nor structureless, nor, indeed, indestructible the atoms of modern physical theory bear little resemblance to the atoms of Newtonian mechanics.
Nietzsche’s Nihilism in Walter Benjamin
The search for the fundamental building blocks of atomistic metaphysics must therefore go further and deeper, into the deep waters of the subatomic realm. Yet, instead of providing a definite support for extensionalism, instead of consolidating the notion of solid, formless, elementary chunks of matter as the ultimate basis of all there is our best contemporary physics seems to steadily and consistently undermine it. Matter appeared to manifest itself in the form of waves subjected to the universal influence of fields of force.
What was the ontological nature of these new existents, mater waves and force fields? Does this all ultimately undermine the basic concept of material atoms as the particulate constituents of the universe? Rejecting the idea that a mechanical substance, the ether, must carry the vibrations of the electromagnetic field, Einstein was driven, in his special relativity theory, to consider the notion of a field as an entity in its own right. In general relativity theory, the structure of space-time itself was identified with a field, the gravitational field.
Thus fields, not atoms, emerge as the primary objects composing the universe. In merging the field of force with space it makes the latter into a physical object in the full sense of the word, an object that produces effects and can in turn be acted upon…Einstein was consistent in trying to overcome the remaining dualism of matter and space by regarding matter, too, as a property of space—particles, for example, as singularities of the metric field. So what has happened to solid, continuous, impenetrable, irreducible, passive particles, that were once held by physicists to constitute the substance of the universe?
Modern physics no longer views ontology from its physical perspective, but only from its mathematical perspective. Modern theories of the physical world are entirely mathematical. But quantum physics goes even more radically beyond all of this. Some quantum theorists argue that the uncertain properties or at least their quantitative aspects by virtue of the fact that they are not or not yet perceived actually do not exist or at least do not exist in the particular universe of a given observer.
Stranger than all of these is the quantum theoretic notion that the act of measurement, and ultimately looking at the measurement of a physical quantum property actually causes the value and states of those properties to come into existence! Thus, due to the impact of quantum theory, physical science has abandoned classical materialism only to embrace quantum idealism mind-caused reality!
That is the actual and proudly trumpeted Copenhagen interpretation of the quantum phenomena most associated with the quantum theoretical ideas of Neils Bohr. This topic will be discussed at length in a future blog post, for now it is sufficient to point out the significance of this problem.
We have reached the peculiar situation where the advance of mainstream science has required us to dismiss as unreal our own existence as free, creative agents, the very condition of there being science at all. Efforts to free science from this dead-end and to give a place to creative becoming in the world have been hampered by unexamined assumptions about what science should be, assumptions which presuppose that if creative becoming is explained, it will be explained away as an illusion. The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is not the only embraced interpretation.
There are others, equally or even more bizarre. Some have reduced the degree of strangeness by introducing explicitly Neoplatonic ideas into their interpretation. You see, the present quantum mechanics does not have any concept of movement or process or continuity in time. It really deals with one moment only, one observation, and the probability that one observation will be followed by another one. But there is obviously process in the physical world. Now I want to say that that process can be understood from the implicate order as this activity of re-projection and re-injection.
So, the theory of the implicate order, carried this far, goes quite beyond present quantum mechanics. This is the current ontological and epistemological crisis of modern physics.
Related Scientific nihilism: on the loss and recovery of physical explanation
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved