Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice book. Happy reading Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Pocket Guide.
1st Edition

We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime. Upcoming SlideShare. Like this presentation? Why not share! Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Published in: Education. Full Name Comment goes here.

Are you sure you want to Yes No. Be the first to like this. No Downloads. Views Total views. Actions Shares. Building on a legacy of work that has chal- lenged a deficit approach to understanding Latino experience in schools Duran, ; Valencia, , ; Zentella, , linguists, sociolinguists, and language development professionals are pushing educational and research agendas that invite us to reconsider the afford a nces of the language practices of many bilingual, bt-dialectical, and Spanish-speaking Latino students as resources for learning K.

Among these efforts, researchers working within the language socialization paradigm have contributed a unique perspective on the role that lan- guage plays in the learning process, in particular, in the development of multiple competencies linguistic and cultural across a myriad of social institutions, but most particularly, in schools. Building on human developmentalist notions of learning, in particular social and cognitive competences that arise in interaction, language socialization research offers a complementary view to psychological approaches to learning.

Thus language socialization research offers a lin- guistic anthropological perspective to address the complex questions of learning to participate in multiple communities and institutions. This chapter provides a review of this work with par- ticular attention to Latino populations in the United States. In the next sections we review the goals and premises of language socialization research. We then discuss the influence of Latino experiences on language socialization research and related studies on language use and learn- ing.

We also review language socialization studies across different educational contexts. We conclude our chapter with a discussion on how language socialization research on Latinos can provide a window into understanding the role of language across contexts of learning. Trie influence of Basil Bernstein's theories reverberated across studies of family and school interactions examining the socialization of the child and the relationship between cognitive development, including language, and social stratification.

Cook-Gumperz captured the significance of language as part of the process of socialization being studied at the time: [T]he study of socialization is the study of how the child learns to demonstrate his [sic] membership of the society, to recognize and practice the making of social events and struc- tures in common with others.

The key to this process which makes it visible for everyday members, and for members as researchers, is language, or rather talk. Inspired by this perspective and the growing research on developmental and social approaches to child language acquisition of the time, a body of work firmly grounded in anthropological tieldwork began to focus on what was beginning to be called, language socialization. Tenets of Language Socialization Research The language socialization approach seeks to understand the ways in which individuals acquire the norms and competencies valued and expected by members of their social group.

In their essay in the Annual Review of Anthropology, the co-founders of the language socialization paradigm, Elinor Ochs and Bambi Schieffelin, proposed that the acquisition of language and socio-cultural disposi- tions was best understood through an integrated, means-ends theoretical and methodological approach. This approach, supported by longitudinal empirical research, captured the process of socialization through the use of language and to the use language a.

The study of social- ization interactions, the authors indicated, was not to be limited to young children and their caregivers in everyday activity as was the focus of the early work in developmental pragmatics but rather, the focus was to be longitudinal, across developmental time, and across the lifespan. Through a focus on everyday routines embedded in social interaction, it was possible to capture how individuals acquired dispositions and behaviors, much of what Bourdieu has called habitus, and how individuals interacted with social structures and institutions Giddens, In short, language socialization provided a way to empirically illustrate the patterns of social reproduction, transformation, and change.

These criteria have made it possible to articulate an important distinction between language socialization studies and studies that look at language socialization interactions. The former adhere to the tenets outlined above, the latter vary in methodology and disciplinary orientation and follow a synchronic approach to socializing interactions. We also note the inclusion of a language socialization entry in the recently published The Prager Handbook of Latino Education in the U.

Bhimji, ; Soto, Across these studies, the questions guiding the work have been influenced by the learning experiences and linguistic practices of different cultural and linguis- tic groups, including Latinos in the United States. The Latino Diacritic in Studies of Language Use and Language Socialization The rich range of linguistic and cultural experiences among Latinos has been central to empiri- cal research that has pushed the theoretical scope of language socialization research and related studies.

While not necessarily a unique or explicit focus of the earlier studies, the experiences of Latinos' were documented as exemplars of the complexity of the acquisition of communicative competence and knowledge and especially in the context of multilingual contact. We call this significant imprint the "Latino diacritic" to capture the multilingual contact, semioticallv and materially experienced, that was studied through the analysis of everyday language practices among Latinos.

Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice

These experiences were foundational to the analysis of studies of speech com- munities, classroom studies, and studies of peer cultures. We review some of this work below. Drawing from a longitudinal, linguistic acquisition corpus from Quiche-speaking Guatema- lan toddlers, Pye's , findings demonstrated how children's early higher cognitive and complex understandings of language were evidenced in their selective use of linguistic and cul- tural expectations.

Pye's work became part of the empirical research that supported Schieffelin and Ochs' a distinction between major forms of communicative accommodations given to children in their description of child-centered versus situation-centered approaches to social- ization p.

Thus, the cross-cultural comparison of children's language development, and among them Latinos, was used to develop a nascent field studying cognition in social context. We will return to this point, and, in particular, the researchers' focus on Latino language practices in a moment, but we first want to provide the scope of this work. A brief overview of other research on Latinos that influenced early language socialization research include the study of code-switching practices among Puerto Rican speakers Zentella, , sayings and cliches in Puerto Rican Lauria, and Mexican communities Farr, , and teasing routines among Mexican families Eisenberg, Schieffelin and Ochs cite b Eisenberg's research as evidence of language socialization of children in multi-cultural, multilingual, and polyadic communities in contrast to dyadic turn-taking models in White middle-class family interactions.

Eisenberg had examined the socializing routines of two Mexican immigrant families living in northern California. This work illustrated the multifaceted nature of one speech event in its varied contexts of interaction. Spanish-English speaking Latino practices and settings thus pro- vided a context for cross-cultural comparisons and challenged the dominant American White middle-class models of interaction, learning, and development that were predominant in earlier research on acquisition and competence.

These and other language practices became central to discussions of speech community. In addition to monographs describing the Latino speech community Peftalosa, , we mention two noteworthy volumes addressing the Spanish language context for Latinos in the U. Many of the studies included in these two collec- tions ranged from formal linguistic analysis of local varieties of Spanish M. Gutierrez, ; jacobson, to pragmatic concerns including the usage of tu and usted Jaramillo, In these early studies there is the recognition of the diversity within community rather than across community.

  • Columbarium?
  • [Doc] Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practi…;
  • Grads Guide to Graduate Admissions Essays: Examples from Real Students Who Got into Top Schools;
  • Shop now and earn 2 points per $1.

A prime example of this work is Ana Celia Zentella's ethnographic study of a Puerto Rican neighborhood in New York City, mentioned at the outset of this sec- tion, a study documenting the cultural logic of code-switching strategies among Latino youth— work that would lead to her landmark monograph. Growing Up Bilingual, where she examined those code-switching socializing practices in their contexts of immigration and socio-political contact Zentella, Similarly, ValdeV and Silva-Corvalan's , studies on code-switching and language patterns also influenced the study of language development and practices of immigrant Latino groups in the United States, including important studies of lan- guage learning in school and of language contact and change in Los Angeles.

Drawing on research carried out in England and the United States, Gumperz became a leading figure in studying language competence in context, what we now know as sociolinguis- tics. The major premises for defining sociolinguistic competence were derived from analyses of audio-recorded talk of a range of bi-dialectical and bilingual speech communities including those of English, Slovenian-German speakers, and those of Spanish-English Chicano2 inter- locutors. Gumperz' early analyses of code-switching and language borrowing were laden with references to language attitudes and identity markers that reflected a variety of language reper- toires and worldviews of Chicano Spanish and Calo3 as were used by Mexican American speak- ers residing in the U.

In his collaborative work with noted Chicano sociolinguist Enrique Hernandez-Chavez, both authors asserted, and in effect, advanced earlier work on lan- guage ideologies, now an area of central concern in language socialization research: [WJhen political ideology changes, attitudes to code switching may change also. In Cali- fornia and elsewhere in the South West pocho or calo served as a pejorative term for the Spanish of local Chicanos.

Handbook of Latinos and Education

But with the awakening of ethnic consciousness and the growing pride in local folk traditions, these speech styles and the code switching they imply have become symbolic of Chicano ethnic values In bilingual groups as in other human com- Language Socialization Among Latinos munities the relationship of language usage to language ideology is a complex one which cannot be taken for granted. In a poignant critique of anthropological and linguistic research on Chicano4 language practices, Americo Paredes reminded linguists and anthropolo- gists that code-switching and word play expressed particular worldviews and histories beyond their denotational forms.

He warned that a narrow understanding of distinct and rich lan- guage practices could lead to essentializing descriptions of their speakers and their practices and produce an early mapping of language practice with ethnic group. Regrettably, in spite of Paredes' call, essentializing analyses of Latinos and their practices remain a problem in the study of minority groups and their cultural and linguistic practices. Briggs has provided a methodological approach to Paredes' critique.

Drawing on his experience conducting fieldwork among Mexicano5 communities in New Mexico, Briggs wrote on the importance of conducting field interviews through the identification of what he called, metacommunicative actions, or actions that provide insight into cultural specific beliefs about language. Thus, it is not just the linguistic data that matter in fieldwork situations, but developing the socio-cultural sensitivities through extended observa- tion and participation in the activities being investigated. The study of everyday language use and the language learning experiences of Latinos in the United States contributed to theoretical developments in the related field of second language acquisition SLA.

For example, Schumann's Acculturation Model was largely based on the communicative experiences of his Costa Rican informant, Alberto, who did not display language development beyond a certain measurable point. The practices of these speakers crystallized into theories of language development, and while rigorously adhering to the methodology of the time, absent in this work is an examination of the socio-historical and economic factors that may have influenced these speakers' decisions to either integrate or distance themselves from the mainstream of U.

Notwithstanding, these theories continue to be central to an understanding of SLA theoretical developments and principles. Of significance, Mehan's study of interactional routines in the class- rooms took place in a San Diego school located in a low-income Black and Mexican American neighborhood. Mehan's study provided foundational evidence for describing how social status and roles are structured through schooling. Mehan's Initiation-Response-Evaluation I-R-E model, which captured among other things, the control of knowledge by teachers, has become the cornerstone of classroom discourse analysis validating and inspiring interest in the use of naturalistic language analysis methodology for studying conditions of structure and achieve- ment in schools Macbeth, Most importantly, Bern- stein's analysis of the educational opportunities that language code and class afforded made an important argument for looking at the integrated contexts of schooling.

Thus, the importance of educational contexts as sites for testing out theories of language use, including code-switching, and for their potential for informing and shaping student achievement disparities was high- lighted and was to form the core of new fields that were generated at the time, including socio - linguistic theory and language socialization. The experience of bilingual young Latino children, in particular the contexts for the development of code-switching skills, were also the subject of these earlier research efforts. Early language socialization research focused on the development of communicative competence of Spanish-English bilinguals Genishi, ; Gumperz, This work represented a blend of approaches to describe the social aspects and parameters of language in use through the ethnography of communication framework Hymes, and the then emergent language socialization paradigm.

Genishi carried out one of the earliest exploratory studies investigating language socialization of bilingual children. Predating the current language socialization framework, Genishi's study of code- switching among 6-year-old Latino Spanish-English bilinguals living in northern California drew on Hymes' ethnographies of communication model describing the "microparameters of language use" defined by four variables including contexts or situations, communicative acts, rules for communication, and the social meaning of talk.

Genishi recorded naturally occurring talk among these children in a variety of settings and with different interlocutors. Genishi's study thus set the stage for continued work on bilingual code-switching in practice. Peer Cultures William Corsaro's studies provided some of the earliest accounts of childhood social- ization in peer cultures, in particular of friendship and social status, among pre-school age children.

His studies extended notions of human development by drawing from symbolic inter- action theory Cicourel, ; G. The children participating in Corsaro's studies were from White middle-class backgrounds and minority group populations including Mexi- can American, Black, and Asian families. His work influenced a number of current studies on peer culture, some of which have critiqued the earlier focus of many language socialization studies which tended to focus on only adult-child based models of socialization Kyratzis, a, Kyratzis has argued for the use of peer-based children's models of language socialization since children produce and organize themselves through a variety of stances and activities "that have not been previously modeled by adults" Kyratzis, b.

In the tradition of the ethnography of speaking, Goodwin examined the distinctions made between male and female peer group during play, where female gamesmanship had been seen as less complex and more conflict-free, through the observation of participant routines in the game of Hopscotch. Goodwin set out to understand this perception. Goodwin observed that girls actively co-constructed and negotiated the rules of their participation in the game. She has provided a nuanced typology of speech acts and pitch alternations through which girls refereed their own participation and stance taking that included calling out transgressors and the strict enforcement of rules.

Her work has challenged deficit interpretations that girls' games were not intellectually complex—assertions that had ramifications for understanding the development of social skills socialization among girls.

Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice - CRC Press Book

Research among older peer groups have included socio- linguistic studies of Latina gangs in Northern California Mendoza Denton, a, c and of socialization of Latino male gang behavior and language in school Rymes, , We will review Rymes' language socialization study in later sections of this chapter. In this section we have reviewed how the experiences of Latinos have been central to empir- ical research that pushed the theoretical scope of studies, and which in turn, led to a more defined articulation of the language socialization paradigm among other related disciplines.

Yet we note that a notion of Latino as a cultural group remains unproblematized. While "culture" is often used as an identity marker, culture is not synonymous with a particular ethnic, linguistic, racial or national identities, and certainly not with an abstract, unified, or universal pattern of behavior. Cultural phenomena are never universal, they are always varied, local, and situated in a particular social context.

By defining culture as a set of shared meanings, classic norms of analysis make it difficult to study zones of difference within and between cultures" pp. Language socialization research can move us away from the unproblematic mappings of language onto culture and provide insights into how cultural knowledge is mediated and how membership to particular cultural identities is negotiated by examining both shared and varied cultural interactions.

But this relationship requires explicit articulation otherwise we run the risk of continuing to work on an ascribed category of "Latino" as a cultural given and not as construct of social analysis. The work described in this section also raises questions on the role of researchers engaged in studies of Latino populations.

We argue that the analytical attention to the language practices of the everyday and routine as promoted in the past and encouraged today , has the potential to exclude attention to the broader context. Aside from Paredes' and Briggs' critiques, attention to the socio-political context of Latino experience in the United States had been minimized, if not ignored. In the s and s, Latinos had taken significant political stances against poverty and had organized and contributed to the civil rights movement.

We note too that by the time studies on the Chicano speech community were published, there were broader discourses on Latinos' organizing efforts around school desegregation and immigration laws Rosales, ; Vigil, That is, the presence of Latinos in the United States was not simply that of an immi- grant or cultural group, but of social actors in the making of a democratic nation. The attention given to Latinos in early language socialization research and other related areas of inquiry offered at best a limited scope and view of the Latino experience.

Perhaps more unset- tling is to accept that the focus on collecting data at the local level reinforced the practices of anthropologists and other social scientists concerned with understanding human behavior and development that constructed a cultural "other," a static and invariant object of scrutiny and comparative analysis. The investigative lens hardly ever turned to the researcher engaged in the practice of ethnographic work or disciplinary field expansion Fabian, ; Kulick, We are compelled to engage this discussion, for while attention to Latino experience provides a much-needed deviation from White middle-class norms and moved us towards a more dynamic understanding of learning, it does not escape the grip of the "etherizing" gaze without conscious investment.

These points need to be engaged openly when conducting language socialization research since the paradigm has the potential to analytically tie the local and the global and as Patricia llaquedano-Lopez, Gabino Arredondo, and large Soli's we seek to understand the processes of reproduction, transformation, and social change.

The research enterprise is also part of these processes of transformation. Language Socialization Practices of Latinos across Educational Contexts Today, there is a growing body of language socialization studies examining a variety of educa- tional settings and practices among Latinos. Challenged by the realities of a history of exclusion ot Latinos m the academic pipeline, researchers whose work addresses the nexus between lan- guage, culture, and education are increasingly turning their attention to the language social- ization paradigm to complicate one-to-one correspondences between variables such as low socio-economic status and low educational attainment and to explore the complexity of learn- ing and becoming students in U.

Language socialization research offers a framework for capturing learning processes in con- text and as a collaborative activity among experts and novices where language is the main tool tor learning Vygotsky, In addition to book-length monographs on Latino families and schooling practices N. We sound the same cautionary note stated at the start of this chapter, that is, that much work, and much of it good, has been done under the banner ot language socialization research, but the studies, which are often identified as language socialization, are not always so in theoretical or methodological orientation; rather, they often examine instances of language socialization and do not emerge from description and analysis ot long-term, ethnographic studies of socialization to language as well as socialization through language.

The notion of "language" that language socialization research undertakes includes the symbolic systems used to encode socio-cultural models of learning and of competence. Ochs references this meaning of language as including both the grammatical sentence and other structures. Language use encompasses "discourse" which includes sets of norms, prefer- ences, and expectations related to linguistic structures including "speech acts, conversational sequences, episodes, rounds, speech activities, speech events, genres, and registers" p.

The relevance of this notion of language to studies of Latinos and education can be appreciated at two levels. First, as the body ot work across discourse-related activities illuminates, there are situated practices that shape a range of social identities. Second, and most importantly, the view of language and discourse afforded by the language socialization paradigm provides opportuni- ties to examine the relationship between language structure and the social processes in which it is embedded.

Home and School Continuities The investigation of language socialization practices in the home has provided a view into the relationship between home and school that has often highlighted the discontinuities across these two important socializing domains. This concern, first taken up by Heath's land- mark study of Black and White working communities in the Piedmont Carolinas can be traced to Basil Bernstein's discussion of the relationship between restricted and elaborated codes and the opportunities that elaborated codes provided for some children's productive participation in school.

Ihe Vasquez et al. Through a Language Socialization Among Latinos comparison of scaffolding scripts between home and school, the authors sought to find discon- tinuities or mismatches across these settings, to understand school failure of minority students. Ethnographic studies at the time, and many of them language socialization studies Boggs, ; Heath, ; Philips, , had indicated that students from ethnic minority communities did not engage in speech with peers and adults in ways that were extended, structured, directive, or expanded as those that occurred among White, middle-class children and their interlocu- tors.

Vasquez et al. The authors noted that these conversational patterns func- tioned to clarify and elaborate on children's requests. This was an important finding that cau- tioned researchers and educators not to assume that the differences between home and school were neatly separated. The discourse patterns found in Latino homes were similar to discourse patterns of the school, and to those identified with White middle-class homes. The authors also noted the deliberate ways parents enforced maintenance of the home language and culture.

This set of language socialization studies opened up opportunities to reframe attention to home- school connections. Farr described local literacy practices in public and private domains that overlapped with the contexts of school and home. Her ethnographic observations offered a detailed description of rich literacies outside school that included Catho- lic religious education using Spanish texts during church services on Sunday, prayer days during the week, and Saturday catechism classes in Spanish doctrina.

Farr explained that all oral and written language used by teachers in the religious classes promoted the unique use of Spanish language skills by integrating a range of texts almost exclusively in Spanish as well as other genres in Spanish such as songs or prayers; p. As with the Vasquez et al. Designed as a language socialization study. Gonzalez' research began to incorporate the larger dimensions of the socio-cuitural context of the borderlands, including the interplay of political economies and social identities.

Her study provided an illustration of the ways in which socialization does not necessarily mean that only one ideology or cultural norm is transmitted to young children. On the contrary, what Latino children learn is the unique way their immediate social context of interaction evokes and embodies their race and class minority status. A significant contribu tion to educational research is her critique of what we generally conceive as "culturally relevant" may actually be more indicative of a position that considers all Latinos to share the same socio- historical dispositions.

As our knowledge of Latino student experiences in schools increases through multiple meth- ods and theoretical approaches, Rodriguez reminds us that there are significant num- bers of Latino students with special needs in our schools. There is urgency to understand and promote home-school continuities for these students. While language socialization research in other settings has turned its attention to students with special needs Ochs, , we know relatively little of these language socialization practices among Latino students at home and at school. Rodriguez conducted observations of Dominican families in New York focusing on literacy practices at home and found that there were many rich literacy texts and activities that involved parents and children in productive and sustained interaction.

Of interest, these activities were also related to the practical problems that families needed to solve, such as paying bills or writing money orders or checks. All of these are fundamentally problem-solving prac- tices that invoke not just cognitive attention, but socio-economic dispositions as well. Her research, conducted with a team of teachers, revealed that families valued literacy practices at home which in addition to school subjects, also ran the gamut of family life and experience—legal matters, health concerns, and religious and spiritual activities.

Of significance were the teachers' responses to the home visits and interviews they carried out as part of the design of the study. They reported that they had gained. An important implication of Mercado's study, and indeed of all "funds of knowledge" research, is the assertion that that teacher contact with the home affords the pos- sibility of informed curricular reform.

The Broader Context of School Reform Rymes study examined the language socialization experiences of Black and Latino stu- dents and teachers at a continuation high school in Los Angeles, she focused on the narratives of "dropping out" and "dropping in" that Latino students told to frame the tensions they experi- enced between their peer activities, many gang-related, and their dis-engagement and participa- tion in school practices. These students' narratives provided insight into the larger tensions that these students experienced as minority youth in Los Angeles Rymes, Rymes' nine-month study was the first attempt to examine school reform through the language socialization para- digm.

In her study, Rymes followed the discourses and practices of stakeholders in the creation, and the unfortunate closing, of the school. The other significant contribution to the study of school reform is Yang's two-year ethnographic study of a largely Black and Latino school district in northern California. Yang studied more centrally the discourses of school reform at public meetings among parents, school administrators, and the staff of the main school reform office that led to the formation of a small schools movement in northern California, and the eventual autonomy from the school dis- trict.

Yang contributes an important critique of the "complicitous researcher" who never plays a detached or distant role. In his case, he was a key player in the office for school reform in the district. These two studies provide a broad view of language socialization not appreciated before, that is, how schooling institutions are locally structured and in turn, how these structuring processes shape and influence the dispositions and actions of individuals participating in those institutions Giddens, This area of research has the potential to expand into complex and integrative research, especially as education researchers incorporate language socialization approaches to the study of institutional and organizational structures.

Clandinin & Husu: The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education

Home and Community Contexts Eisenberg's study addresses a different type of discontinuity, one previously identified between European and Mexican-descent socialization to cognitive development in children, and that is the quality of maternal teaching talk and register. Eisenberg observed interactions during tasks and activities at home that were coded for teaching and scaffolding registers and which included the use of positive-negative feedback, structuring, questioning, and degrees of demand and directiveness of attention understood as supporting cognitive complexity.

The study uncovered a range of responses across socio-economic statuses and tasks suggesting the importance of examining individual variation in the context of everyday activities p. While not strictly a language socialization study, Eisenberg's study draws on its distinctive meth- Language Socialization Among Latinos odology in that it included ethnographic observation and detailed analysis of language form.

Bhimji's study provides a complementary example to Hisenberg's findings as she studied the use of directives, identified as a distinctive dis-preferred leature of American White middle- class maternal discourse in low-income Mexican families. Bhimii relied on longitudinal, ethno- graphic methodology to document how directives were not uniformly controlling processes or imperative m torm, but rather they could include other types ot directives e.

Main content

Studies by de I,eon have been contributing significantly to language socialization theory and method, particularly for her detailed study of the participatory linguistic and interactional patterns ot infants' early communication with caregivers, expanding on the earlier distinction between child-oriented and situation-oriented interactions.

Her studies provide a nuanced description ot pointing, gaze direction, and direc- tives "say x" that socialize participatory competence prior to language development , p. These data included a smaller pool of interviews of families that ranged in their use ot Hnglish and Spanish p. While there is attention to language form and expression, the focus in this study is on language as habitual rather than as a tool for learning.

A critique advanced in this study is the need to deepen our understanding of how immigrant and language minority communities maintain and manage the use of Hnglish and Spanish at home, in school, and at work. This is an example of code per- sistence that has the potential to counter arguments ot language loss, especially in the United States where English is the favored code. Zentella's long-term ethnographic study ot the language repertoires of el bhnjue, a working-class Puerto Rican community in New York City, demonstrated that bilingual devel- opment was a collaborative, multi-directional process that relied on the social interactions between caregivers children, children-caregivers, children-children, and caregivers-caregivers.

Zentella demonstrated that "language shift," or loss ot Spanish and preference lor English monolingualism, required a grounded analysis of how social networks and local resources are shaped in turn by macro structurations that impinge on speech communities, for example, migrations out of the com- munity due to economic flux. Religious Contexts A strand of language socialization studies has looked at religious institutions and their social- izing force through language and literacy instruction. More specific to Latino populations, the doctrina context for immigrant Mexican children's literacy development had already been identified Farr.

Baquedano-Lopez' , , studies of religious instruction in Spanish for children, doctrina, at two Catholic parishes in California have provided a window into understanding the processes of transnational identity formation and literacy. Through nar- rative tellings of the religious icon, of Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe Our Lady of Guadalupe and other literacy practices such as saying prayers and telling Bible stories, the doctrina children were taught to adopt was a collective social identity as they learned to identify with Mexico in the context of Catholic instruction in the United States—even when children participating in these classes were not all of Mexican descent.

These practices influenced linguistic and cultural continuity, including actual religious practice across space and time in spite of documented exclusionary debates against Mexican immigrants in the public discourse of the state of Cal- ifornia and within one of the parishes where doctrina was offered Baquedano-Lopez, ; Baquedano-Ldpez, Leyva, St Baretto, Ek's study , of a Los Angeles Pentecostal church's classes for adolescents illuminated different socialization dynamics that through the moral force to stay on the Christian path universalized and erased ethnic differences for the mostly Central American congregation.

These studies invite an examination of the different political presence of Latino ethnic groups in the United States and of the history of the various religious traditions in the Americas as they illustrate how in one context, students identify eth- nically with the majority group and in the other, those ethnicities are minimized. The responses of Latinos to church discourses and practices are significant as Relano-Pastor has illustrated. Drawing primarily from interview data in southern California, Relano- 1'astor explained how immigrants sometimes find themselves at odds with an institution that fails to recognize their cultural values.

Rela no-Pastor described a mother's moralizing and socializing responses to what she perceived and evaluated as exclusionary and insulting prac- tices during Catholic mass where English was used instead of Spanish for a largely Spanish- speaking audience. In this section we have reviewed language socialization studies across educational contexts. Our survey of home and school research reveals a tendency in this work to focus on continuities rather than discontinuities. That is, the work we reviewed illustrates that the practices of the home are not always at odds with the practices of school.

This might be indicative of the atten- tion that language socialization researchers pay to the use of language in context. Thus attention to routine activities that involve parents, siblings, peers, and others, expand the participation framework in these activities and draw on a variety of resources.

The result is a view of Latinos that is not rooted in "deficit" notions of educational attainment. Our review of research of Latino practices across the contexts of home, school, and community provides opportunities to under- stand the complexity of the social order s that Latinos in the United States negotiate in the day to day activities across these domains.

Citation metadata

There is the pull to assimilate into mainstream practices and schooling plays a significant role in this process, yet there are spaces and opportunities for resistance and change as captured in the studies of school reform movements of Rymes and Yang The contexts of religious instruction, for example, provide both the means to reproduce systems of ideology and practice but they also generate the tensions that lead to prac- tices of cultural and linguistic resignification in the context of immigration to the United States. In the following section we review the influence of language socialization research on other disciplines, in particular in second language acquisition research and in behavioral studies.

Language Socialization Research across the Disciplines While language socialization research is incorporated into other disciplines, the possibilities for change within the paradigm, or of its premises and tenets, are likely to occur. Language social- ization research is a relatively new approach and although it has solidified its methodology and theoretical orientation in the last few years, it will be difficult to predict the direction that Ian- Language Socialization Among Latinos guage socialization research might take as it is used to examine new topics and new questions, and as technology and methods are continually redefining qualitative inquiry.

In this section we review two disciplinary fields that have begun to incorporate language socialization approaches to learning and development. Second Language Socialization Studies and Second Language Acquisition Language socialization theory and method have inspired new approaches to the study of sec- ond-language acquisition SLA in ways that are redefining dominant themes, including notions of language, learning, and identity in multilingual settings Kramsch, There is however, a distinction here and a comprehensive review is beyond the scope of this chapter between language socialization studies carried out in bilingual and multilingual settings and those addressing SLA questions in those communities.

SLA studies are characterized by their explicit attention to classic questions of language learning of individuals in mixed code settings such as the development of specific linguistic features, the preference for certain codes, or the acquisi- tion of pragmatic competence in another language-culture system.

SLA research has maintained a special position in the study of Latino education in the United States providing explanations and description of contexts of bilingual interaction in and out of school Valdes, ; Zentella, and language maintenance and shift Silva-Corvalan, , Recent contributions drawn from language socialization research in education that examine SLA are proliferating and they are attending to the social contexts for learning in the study of language acquisition.

In her study she examined how Latino and African American students contested and engaged, and at times, reframed, the code-switching practices and ideologies about the value of English and Spanish in school and society at large. Rymes suggests that language socialization theory and method- ology can contribute to a better understanding of how second-language status is used in daily- interactional routines to enforce or resist stigmatized identities.

For example, posing questions that are not readily observable in classic SLA research, such as how routines and habits involv- ing second-language speakers or bilingual speakers reproduce languages and ideologies about languages, could provide a view into the socio-historical setting where language acquisition is taking place. Rymes and Pash expanded on this view.

In their study of the classroom experiences of Rene, a second-grade boy from Costa Rica, Rymes and Pash examined the ways that he compromised his understanding of his social identity and language use. In school he was "passing" as competent in oral skills during classroom interaction, yet he was being designated for special education classes.

The study's focus on classroom routines as preserving identity but perhaps standing in contrast with literacy routines is instructive for understanding the multiple meanings and outcomes of seemingly innocuous classroom practices. As Rene's case illustrates, the participation of a student in classroom routines is intertwined with the expression of other social identities, and in many instances, the conflict generated by participating in classroom routines is not always satisfactorily resolved.

Willet's study of interactional classroom routines in an ESL classroom was also carried out from a language socialization perspective. She described the socio-cultural dimensions, or what she calls the micro-politics of classroom interaction, to explain how ESL students in first grade become socialized to school routines, communicative competence, and academic identi- ties. While located in a classroom where many languages were being spoken including Korean, Patricia Baquedano-Lopez, Gabino Arredondo, and large Salts Hebrew, Arabic, and Spanish, Willet described the case of Xavier a Latino Spanish-speaking student whose classroom strategies were similar to those of Rene in the Rymes and Pash study.

Willet described, using discourse-analytic methodology and sustained ethnographic observation, how Xavier was set-up to fail in this classroom through routines that positioned him in need of more guided adult support and away from the rich contexts of peer support. Thus, in comparison to two girls, the other focal students in Willet's study, Xavier learned to competently navigate the general social contours of classroom participation, but did not acquire the necessary collaborative strategies that could have helped him develop academic skills.

Relevant to the design and implementation of studies of second language socialization is Watson-Gegeo's review of the changing nature of second-language acquisition theory. She has called for an integration of socio-cultural "insights" of language socialization research into new developments of SLA theories and perspectives as a way to balance mentalistic learning theories. She proposes that reviewing the classic questions that inspired early language social- ization work, including questions about theory of mind and linguistic relativity can bolster and legitimize emerging language socialization research in SLA.

According to Watson-Gegeo , language socialization theory can offer six insights that SLA research could incorporate. First, language and culture are mutually constitutive and socially constructed. Second, all cultural activities across different contexts are socio-historically marked. Third, studies of language use offer rich ethnographic context. Fourth, child and adult interactions produce more than gram- matical units they generate culturally meaningful ways of thinking, feeling, and being in the world. Fifth, language socialization uses cultural anthropological concepts of development to describe community, cognition, and identity.

In summary, she lays out requirements for the application of language socialization theory in SLA studies that must combine ethnographic, sociolinguistic and discourse analytic methods and that may include ecologically valid quan- titative methodology, Watson-Gegeo notes that this enterprise could represent the birth of a new paradigm, yet welcomes the idea that SLA research would move away from the study of learning in a context that "typically derives from a positivist, experimental model of research that attempts to control variables rather than account for the complexities of people's real lives situations" p.

Behavioral and Developmental Studies In addition to integrating perspectives in the field of Second Language Acquisition, language socialization research has been taken up in the behavioral sciences. From the editors' perspective, the studies provide a more comprehen- sive view of Mexican family life and of children's and parents' attitudes and beliefs regarding language choice. Our review of this collection supports the editors' assertion and we further note that the work challenges deficit views of Mexican families' language practices, such as infrequent use of cognitively complex talk by mothers Eisenberg, ; Moreno, The studies highlight the role of other conversational partners besides the mother Perez-Grana- dos, , expanding the documentation of the range of participation frameworks for the developing child, breaking away from dyadic interactions.

The various articles address topics as diverse as emotion Cervantes, , the social context of home literacy role of siblings in socialization and the learning of normative scripts such as objective labeling and school- like scaffolding strategies Perez-Granados, Except for the Pease-Alvarez study, these studies could not be characterized as language socialization studies in their design, but they do focus on many instances of socializing interactions using a variety of methods from quasi- experimental to ethnographic. Language Socialization Among Latinos Future Trajectories I he review ot the work presented in this chapter gives us a way to appraise the development and direction of language socialization research conducted among Latinos.

Language socializa- tion is a viable approach for understanding the complex of experience of Latinos in the United States.

  • A Private History of Awe.
  • Reward Yourself?
  • Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice.

In this era of high-stakes accountability that drives educational policy, narrow notions of learning are being generated as benchmarks for achievement and competence. As the language socialization approach is taken up by education researchers and researchers in other disciplines, we can begin to move away from attention to the principles and premises of language socialization research often focusing on both perceived and actual limita- tions and move towards more theoretically nuanced and complex studies that could expand its conceptual domain.

In her recent edited book, Zentella reminds us of the work that still needs to be done to counter the ways Latino children are misunderstood and understudied. Lan- guage socialization research offers a way to understand the lives of children and their families while attending to both their local and larger contexts of interaction. Zentella has offered challenging critiques to researchers working among minority popu- lations. She reminds us of the need to be accountable other than the accountability created through peer-review for the work that we do. Her call for a more "anthropolitical linguistics" is fitting and relevant to language socialization research as well.

In our review of the early research on language use and classroom discourse, it was surprising to find research that did not identify student populations, yet pseudonyms with Spanish-sounding names were the only indicators that the Lnglish translated dialogue had taken place among Latinos. As we have indicated, much of the earlier research of Latinos tended to be carried outside of its socio-historical context. To paraphrase Hymes' call for a fuller description of speech in community—it matters who speaks, to whom, and under what conditions.

To revoice Zentella's words—it matters who does the research and for what purposes.

  • An Economic History of London 1800-1914 (Routledge Explorations in Economic History)?
  • Microstructural Characterization of Materials.
  • SearchWorks Catalog;
  • Ergodic theory and topological dynamics, Volume 70.
  • Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice;
  • Clin-alert 2001 : a quick reference to adverse clinical events!

We conclude our chapter with two concrete and brief sug- gestions for language socialization research on Latinos and education. Revisiting the Meaning of Competence As research in language socialization proliferates, it is important to revisit the meaning behind the concept ot "competence," which does not simply refer to the acquisition of language. Lan- guage socialization points to language as the primary tool for expressing socio-eultural and pragmatic meaning and as the focal means tor competent socialization.

While the quote above references children, it is not difficult to extend this meaning to a variety of contexts and age groups. The core ot socialization lies in the ability to display expected competencies, yet it does not always guarantee the display of such knowledge.

The research we reviewed here illustrated many instances where norms of expected behavior were Patricia Baquedano-Ldpez, Gabino Arredondo, and Jorge Solis not displayed, for example the actions of Rene in the Rymes and Pash study. Investigat- ing why competencies are displayed in some cases but not in others demands paying attention to both the local organizations of activities but also the broader socio-political and economic contexts.

There is an urgent need to revisit what competence means for Latinos in particular English-Language Learners Duran, ; Garcia, Language socialization research has the methodological and theoretical tools to help us examine these contexts. A Move away from Comparisons to American White Middle-Class Norms As language socialization research expands into other fields and domains, it would be impor- tant to see a shift away from the tendency of using AWMC cultural models as benchmarks for understanding Latino practices and indeed of other minority group practices.

After 20 years of language socialization research, we find that this approach still filters through the most recent language socialization studies among Latinos. An exhaustive examination of how home literacy activities in a variety of Latino homes e. In this regard, language socialization with its core approach to understanding learning and development in social context has the potential to bring into focus internal variation, that is, the diversity that exists within Latino linguistic and cultural practices and worldviews. We add here a reference to Mendoza-Denton b who finds that the study of a "linguistics of contact" citing Pratt, , and what we capture in this chapter under the rubric Latino diacritic, pro- vides a conceptual entry to examine how cultural borders and the practices within and across them are shared and enacted.

Mendoza-Denton explains that through this type of analysis we can "find the articulation of different levels of semiotic systems, where subtle linguistic cues work in tandem with material culture to index history and ideology" p. This is precisely the area where studies of Latino language socialization can deepen our understanding of how macro-social processes shape educational practices and how cultural process become natural- ized in face-to-face interaction and in everyday practice. Language socialization research can bridge this divide.

Acknowledgments We express our appreciation and respect to all the scholars who have contributed to our current understanding of the role of language socialization in learning, in particular Elinor Ochs and Bambi Schieffelin. We thank Ana Celia Zentella for inspiring and challenging the way we frame research for and by Latinos. Notes 1. While many studies on Latinos assume that the majority of Latinos speak Spanish, we include here indigenous languages of the Americas and make reference to the research among indigenous groups that have influenced language socialization research.

Gumperz refers here to Mexican-Americans of the U. Spanish variant spoken by Chicanos. Language Socialization Among Latinos 4. Wo use here Paredes' meaning to indicate Mexican-descent populations in the United States. Here we adhere to the use that the authors we review employed in their work.

Spanish speakers in northern New Mexico. The idea that in the development of second language grammars learners encounter and work against dissimilar features of each source language. See V. Gonzalez , however, for an alternative, perhaps less inclusive, interpretation of this definition. Mexican immigrants in Chicago. We direct the reader to de Leon's article for a complete list of references of this formidable work. References Auer, P. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Baquedano-I dpez, P.

Creating social identity through doctrina narratives, issues in Applied Lin- guistics, ,1 1 , , Baquedano-I. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Baquedano-Lopez, P. Creating social identities through doctrina narratives. Duranti Kd. A reader pp. Maiden, MA: Blacku-ell. Traversing the Center: The politics of language use in a Catholic religious education program for immigrant Mexican children.

Strategies for linguistic and cultural continuity in Spanish-based Catholic religious education programs doctrina. Spanish m the United States: Sociolinguistic issues. Bernstein, B.

Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice

Related Handbook of Latinos and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice

Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved